Skip to main content

The Wright Brothers' Patents and the Curtiss Company

Patents have often played a complex role in the balance between fostering innovation and potentially hindering progress. A well-known example is the case of the Wright brothers and their patents on airplane technology in the early 20th century.

After the Wright brothers achieved the first powered flight in 1903, they secured a series of patents for their flying machine, particularly focusing on the method of flight control, which was a breakthrough in aviation. However, rather than promoting further development, these patents led to a protracted legal battle with other aviation pioneers, most notably Glenn Curtiss and his company.

Wright brothers aggressively pursued legal action against anyone who built airplanes that they felt infringed on their patents, especially the use of ailerons by Curtiss for lateral control. This created a stifling environment for other aviation innovators, as they either had to pay costly licensing fees, face legal battles, or find alternative, often less effective, methods of flight control.

These patent wars significantly hampered the development of the aviation industry in the United States during a critical period of technological advancement. Many historians and aviation experts argue that this slowed the pace of innovation in American aviation, while European countries, not bogged down by such legal issues, made significant strides in airplane development during this time.

The situation reached a point where the U.S. government had to intervene during World War I. Faced with the need for rapid advancement in aviation technology for the war effort, the U.S. government urged the creation of a cross-licensing organization—the Manufacturers Aircraft Association—which allowed all parties to use each other's patents, thus ending the legal stalemate and reigniting innovation.